Drawing for THERMES MARINS DE MONACO

USPTO serial 79002914

THERMES MARINS DE MONACO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2970805Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 19, 2005
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THERMES MARINS DE MONACO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alan Blum

Alan Blum Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges LLP51 Madison AvenueNew York, NY 10010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps for personal use, namely, deodorant soaps, hand soaps, medicated soaps, shaving soaps, skin soaps; perfumery; essential oils for personal use; cosmetics; body deodorants and hair lotionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
044Hygiene and beauty care services, namely, cosmetic electrolysis, hair styling, sea peel, massages; spa treatment, namely, cosmetic body care services, marine treatment, hydromassage, seaweed baths, essential oil baths, jet showers; thalassotherapy treatment; health spa services, namely, physiotherapy, marine hydrotherapy and balneotherapySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2011DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 5, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2009COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Apr 14, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Apr 13, 2009LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 2, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 16, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 25, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 7, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 2, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 22, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance