USPTO serial 79002930
PICTONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PICTONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-75020 PARIS, FR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications, information on telecommunications; communications via computer terminals or via fiber-optic networks; radio or telephone communications; mobile radiotelephony services; provision of access to a global computer network; electronic display services (telecommunications); connection by telecommunications to a global computer network; news or information agencies; rental of telecommunication apparatus; radio or television broadcasts; teleconferencing services; electronic messaging services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Education; training; entertainment; sporting and cultural activities; information on educational or entertainment events; leisure services; publication of books; book lending; animal training; videotape film production; rental of motion pictures; rental of sound recordings; rental of video cassette recorders or of radios and television sets; rental of show scenery, videotape editing; photographic services; organization of competitions (education or entertainment), arranging and conducting of colloquiums, conferences or conventions; organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes; booking of seats for shows; providing games on line (on a computer network), gambling services; online electronic publication of books and periodicals, desktop publishing | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Evaluations, assessments and research in the fields of science and technology provided by engineers; computer and software design and development; legal services; research and development of new products (for third parties), engineering project studies; architecture, design of interior decor, development (design), installation, maintenance, updating or rental of computer software; computer programming; computer consultancy; conversion of data and computer programs (other than physical conversion); conversion of documents from a physical medium to an electronic medium, technical inspection of motor cars, graphic arts designing services; styling (industrial design); legal research; intellectual property consultancy; authentication of works of art; scientific investigations for medical purposes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 17, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |