USPTO serial 79002951
ARISTOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3187486Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 19, 2006
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARISTOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
A-8441 Kitzeck, AT
A-8441 Kitzeck, AT
A-8441 Kitzeck, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abe1man
LAWRENCE E ABE1MAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Red wines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2015 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |