Drawing for MTS

USPTO serial 79002987

MTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3171643Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 14, 2006
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with MTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006MANUALLY OPERATED VALVES OF METALACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2022CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 13, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 13, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 28, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2016NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 201615AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Jan 28, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 28, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 30, 201515AFREGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED—
Dec 30, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2015E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2014PRANPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED—
Sep 26, 2012EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2012TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Sep 5, 2012CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 5, 2012CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Apr 7, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2012PRANPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED—
Apr 7, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 7, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 14, 2012E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2011PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 25, 2010RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 7, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 5, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 21, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 21, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 13, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 29, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 9, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 22, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 1, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 3, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 3, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 20, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance