USPTO serial 79003008
ELEA EJIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELEA EJIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations;soaps; perfumery, essential oils for personal use, cosmetics, hair lotions and lotions for cosmetic purposes; dentifrices; scented water, astringents for cosmetic purposes, hair dyes, hair colorants, shoe wax, bath salts, not for medical purposes, cosmetic preparations for baths, mouthwashes, not for medical purposes, hydrogen peroxide for cosmetic purposes, petroleum jelly for cosmetic purposes, cosmetic preparations for skin, hair and nail care, make-up,deodorants for personal use, depilatories, hair waving preparations, beauty masks, make-up powder, cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes, polish preservatives for leather, nail varnish, hair spray, varnish-removing preparations,oils for cosmetic purposes, cleansing milk for toilet purposes, sun-tanning preparations (cosmetics), antiperspirants (toiletries), toilet water, shampoos | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 27, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 21, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 2, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |