USPTO serial 79003486
E 2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3035938Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 27, 2005
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- MADRID PROCESSING UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E 2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES E. BAXLEY,
Charles E. Baxley Hart, Baxley, Daniels & Holton90 John Street - Suite 403New York, NY 10038-3242UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SKIS ROSSIGNOL S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SKIS ROSSIGNOL S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SALOMON SAS
- Other trademarks owned by SALOMON S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SALOMON S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named E 2
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |