Drawing for CASTEY

USPTO serial 79003625

CASTEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3050986Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 24, 2006
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CASTEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Stew-pans, pots, frying pans, woks, oven trays; kitchen utensils, namely, spatulas, graters, sieves; household containers for food, not of precious metals or coated therewithSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 24, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 28, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 10, 2023CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 10, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 5, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 23, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 21, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
May 21, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 21, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 24, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 24, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 5, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 11, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 5, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 5, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 1, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 24, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance