USPTO serial 79003779
ROTOFLEX AG ENCRES D'IMPRESSION DRUCKFARBEN PRINTING INKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROTOFLEX AG ENCRES D'IMPRESSION DRUCKFARBEN PRINTING INKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Inks, varnishes, auxiliary products for flexographic printing and rotogravure and for the package printing industry | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 19, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |