Drawing for SMARTEX

USPTO serial 79003842

SMARTEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3021145Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 29, 2005
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward M. Weisz

EDWARD M. WEISZ Cozen O'Connor277 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10172UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software recorded on magnetic and optical data media, namely resource planning software in connection with textile machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Engineering project design; computer programming, namely design of resource planning software in connection with textile machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 18, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 21, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 30, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 25, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 25, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 16, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 3, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 21, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance