USPTO serial 79004280
MISKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3068376Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 14, 2006
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MISKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MISKO VIOMICHANIA ZIMARIKON ANONYMOS ETAIRIA
GR
Other trademarks owned by MISKO VIOMICHANIA ZIMARIKON ANONYMOS ETAIRIA
MISKO VIOMICHANIA ZIMARIKON ANONYMOS ETAIRIA
GR
Other trademarks owned by MISKO VIOMICHANIA ZIMARIKON ANONYMOS ETAIRIA
MISKO VIOMICHANIA ZIMARIKON ANONYMOS ETAIRIA
GR
Other trademarks owned by MISKO VIOMICHANIA ZIMARIKON ANONYMOS ETAIRIA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fruits, preserved fruits and dried, cooked, processed and frozen vegetables; tomatoes preserved and canned in different forms, namely peeled, in cubes, tomato juice for cooking, tomato puree; jellies, jams, eggs, milk and dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; bouillon, condensed bouillon, bouillon in cubes, powder for bouillon, extracts for bouillon, light meals for cocktails, namely, omelets, garden salads, cheese chips of fried potatoes, soy bean oil for food | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and products made from cereals, namely bread, corn flakes, biscuits, pasta, toasted bread; flour for food, yeast, pasta, preparations made from flour and flour-milling products, namely, processed semolina and bran, cakes, bakery products, namely, bread, cakes, biscuits, confectionery, namely, small sweets, spoon sweets and sweetmeats, spices, mixes for biscuits, mixes for bread, mixes for pastries, mixes for candies, bread, processed semolina, biscuits, toasted bread, sweet and confectionery products, namely donuts, candy and pastry, ice cream, powder for ice cream, honey, treacle, baking-powder, salt, mustard, vinegar, souses, spices, ice, powder for sweets, namely, chocolate powder, vanilla powder, strawberry powder, corn flour, salad dressings, aromatic processed herbs for food stuffs, namely, mint, thyme, basil, rosemary, oregano, fennel | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Providing of food and drink for guests | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MISKO VIOMICHANIA ZIMARIKON ANONYMOS ETAIRIA
- Other trademarks owned by MISKO VIOMICHANIA ZIMARIKON ANONYMOS ETAIRIA
- Other trademarks owned by MISKO VIOMICHANIA ZIMARIKON ANONYMOS ETAIRIA
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named MISKO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 26, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |