Drawing for AMANIE

USPTO serial 79004409

AMANIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMANIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Confectionery, ;namely-- candies, chocolate products, namely-- chocolate barn,chocolate truffles, chocolate candies, chocolate cookies, chocolate biscuits, chocolate tarts; long keeping pastries; edible iceSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 16, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 19, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 22, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 6, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 9, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 9, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 14, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 12, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 16, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 4, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 29, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 9, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance