USPTO serial 79004639
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Apparatuses for heating, refrigerating, cooling, drying, namely evaporators; apparatuses, namely dryers for the drying of paste, spray dryers, flash dryers, spray dry absorbers, fluid bed dryers, fluid bed agglomerators, namely, devices for agglomeration of fine particles to large particles for purposes of drying solutions, suspensions and slurries; agglomerators for drying, cooling, and agglomeration of powder, spray coolers, all for use with product compositions for use in the food, dairy, chemical and pharmaceutical industries | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |