USPTO serial 79005107
EGERIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EGERIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James F. McKeown
CROWELL & MORING LLPPO BOX 14300WASHINGTON, DC 20044-4300UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Household or kitchen utensils and containers, not of precious metal or coated therewith; combs and sponges; brushes (except paint brushes); brush-making materials; cloth for cleaning purposes made of textile material; dusters, made of terry cloth or other materials; toilet sets | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Household linen (included in this class); textile goods, namely textile fabrics, curtains, table and bed covers; handkerchiefs made of textile material; textile fabrics of all types; bath towels, towels, flannels, facecloths, toilet covers, napkins for children, bed and table covers, all goods either made of terry cloth or other textile material included in this class | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing of all types, in particular bathing and beach clothing, bathrobes, head scarfs, bibs for children, corsets, neckties, braces, gloves, all goods either made of terry cloth or other materials | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 027 | Bathroom carpets and rugs, all goods either made of terry cloth or other materials | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 13, 2021 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |