Drawing for NUIT COQUINE

USPTO serial 79005322

NUIT COQUINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3035989Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 27, 2005
Examiner
DWYER, SEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NUIT COQUINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLP1 Chase RdLackenbach Siegel BuildingScarsdale, NY 10583-4156

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003[ Toilet soaps, ] perfumes [, eaux de toilette, cosmetics, bath milks, body milks, beauty milks, cleansing milks, lotions for face, body, skin, hands and hair, creams and powders for the face, body, skin, and hands, cosmetic bath preparations, namely, bubble baths, bath oils, bath salts, shower gels, shower creams, shower and bath foams, shampoos, hair conditioners, cosmetic hair care goods, namely, styling gels, hair detangling solutions, hair setting solutions, hair shine and gloss solutions, make-up products for the face and body ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 26, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 19, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 30, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 29, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 29, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 4, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 6, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 16, 2013INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 9, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 24, 2012NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 201215AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Apr 24, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 24, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 21, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2011E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 20, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 17, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 3, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 2, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 17, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 14, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 13, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2005RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance