USPTO serial 79005739
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
CABINET BOETTCHER22, RUE DU GéNéRAL FOY, F-75008 PARISFRANCE| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Toilet soaps, perfumes, eaux de toilette, cosmetics, bath milks, body milks, beauty milks, cleansing milks, lotions for face, body, skin, hands and hair, creams and powders for the face, body, skin, and hands, cosmetic bath preparations, namely bubble baths, bath oils, bath salts, shower gels, shower creams, shower and bath foams, shampoos, hair conditioners, cosmetic hair care goods, namely, styling gels, hair detangling solutions, hair setting solutions, hair shine and gloss solutions, make-up products for the face and body | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 9, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |