Drawing for SCCA

USPTO serial 79005839

SCCA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCCA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARIE-ANNE MASTROVITO

MARIE-ANNE MASTROVITO ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, instruction in the field of telecommunications, training courses in the use and operation of telecommunication equipment and telecommunication systems, and organization, conducting, and arranging of seminars, conferences, meetings, symposia, workshops, colloquia and lectures in the field of telecommunicationABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 26, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 13, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 5, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 29, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 8, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 7, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 5, 2006ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Sep 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 2, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Aug 25, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 16, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 4, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 1, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 13, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 13, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 8, 2006ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 15, 2006LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Feb 9, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 27, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED
Oct 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 12, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Oct 12, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Aug 12, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 24, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 12, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance