USPTO serial 79006046
IDOLE DE LUBIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3154199Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 10, 2006
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with IDOLE DE LUBIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme
Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme Pryor Cashman LLP7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumes, perfumes waters, toilet water, [ perfumes soaps for toilet, fragranced bath and body lotions, cosmetics, dentifrices ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STRATEGEM, Société par actions simplifiée
- Other trademarks owned by L'OREAL, Société Anonyme
- Other trademarks owned by STRATEGEM
- Other trademarks owned by STRATEGEM
- Other trademarks owned by STRATEGEM
- Other trademarks owned by L'OREAL
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named IDOLE DE LUBIN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 6, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 19, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 7, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |