USPTO serial 79006163
COLLABORATIVE BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3218146Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 13, 2007
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with COLLABORATIVE BUSINESS EXPERIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeannine Rittenhouse
Jeannine Rittenhouse IpHorgan Ltd.195 Arlington Heights RoadSuite 125BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION; ADVISORY SERVICES FOR BUSINESS MANAGEMENT; COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE; BUSINESS ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT CONSULTING; FACILITY MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING INFRASTRUCTURE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR INDUSTRIAL OR COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISES; BUSINESS CONSULTING IN INFORMATION AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT; COMPUTERIZED FILE MANAGEMENT; EXPERT APPRAISAL SERVICES REGARDING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS AMONG USERS OF COMPUTERS CONNECTED VIA FIBRE-OPTIC NETWORKS; PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT TELECOMMUNICATIONS; PROVIDING ACCESS BY TELECOMMUNICATION MEANS AND CONNECTION TO COMPUTER DATABASES IN THE FIELD OR TO THE INTERNET; PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO DATABASES IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS AND COMPUTING VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming for others; design and development of recorded software and software packages; updating of recorded software and software packages for others; conducting of feasibility studies for the implantation, improvement, modification and use of computer configurations; professional consulting in the field of computing; computer security consultancy and implementation of computer security systems; maintenance of recorded computer software and of software packages; consulting in design, development and management of information systems and of computer-related technologies; consulting in installation, improvement, modification, migration and use of computer configurations; technical support in computing, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems, monitoring of network systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CAP GEMINI
- Other trademarks owned by CAP GEMINI
- Other trademarks owned by Capgemini
- Other trademarks owned by CAP GEMINI
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COLLABORATIVE BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |