USPTO serial 79006163
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,950
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeannine Rittenhouse
Jeannine Rittenhouse IpHorgan Ltd.195 Arlington Heights RoadSuite 125BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION; ADVISORY SERVICES FOR BUSINESS MANAGEMENT; COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE; BUSINESS ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT CONSULTING; FACILITY MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING INFRASTRUCTURE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR INDUSTRIAL OR COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISES; BUSINESS CONSULTING IN INFORMATION AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT; COMPUTERIZED FILE MANAGEMENT; EXPERT APPRAISAL SERVICES REGARDING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS AMONG USERS OF COMPUTERS CONNECTED VIA FIBRE-OPTIC NETWORKS; PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT TELECOMMUNICATIONS; PROVIDING ACCESS BY TELECOMMUNICATION MEANS AND CONNECTION TO COMPUTER DATABASES IN THE FIELD OR TO THE INTERNET; PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO DATABASES IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS AND COMPUTING VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming for others; design and development of recorded software and software packages; updating of recorded software and software packages for others; conducting of feasibility studies for the implantation, improvement, modification and use of computer configurations; professional consulting in the field of computing; computer security consultancy and implementation of computer security systems; maintenance of recorded computer software and of software packages; consulting in design, development and management of information systems and of computer-related technologies; consulting in installation, improvement, modification, migration and use of computer configurations; technical support in computing, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems, monitoring of network systems | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |