USPTO serial 79006191
XELIOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3265239Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2007
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XELIOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer security programs for network software and web sites for protecting network computers from damage caused by malicious software and by unauthorized and unauthentified persons; computer programs for the enabling of access to security zones; computer programs for data and application program protection; computer programs for security using biometric identification for use in the field of business for private use | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Maintenance of computer hardware devices for security purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Rental of computer software in the field of security information systems consulting in the field of securities; software and technical computer consulting in the field of securities; computer software design and development for others in the field of security; maintenance of computer software in the field of security | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SAGEM DEFENSE SECURITE
- Other trademarks owned by SAGEM SA
- Other trademarks owned by SAGEM SA
- Other trademarks owned by SAGEM SA
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named XELIOS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 8, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 1, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |