Drawing for NAPAC

USPTO serial 79006408

NAPAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3063871Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 28, 2006
Examiner
GUSTASON, ANNE C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAPAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN

ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007MACHINES and machine tools FOR THE cutting and FORMING OF MATERIALS; EXTRUSION MOUDLING MACHINESSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
012AUTOMOTIVE INTERIOR TRIM NAMELY, MOTOR VEHICLE INTERIORS MADE OF NATURAL FIBERS, PARTICULARLY MADE OF FIBERS OF CHINESE RUSH AND STRAWSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
020CONTAINERS, NOT OF METAL FOR COMMERCIAL USE MADE OF NATURAL FIBERS, PARTICULARLY MADE OF FIBERS OF CHINESE RUSH AND STRAW; SEMI-WORKED SHAPED PARTS MADE OF NATURAL FIBERS, PARTICULARLY MADE OF FIBERS OF CHINESE RUSH AND STRAWSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
021CONTAINERS FOR HOUSEHOLD AND KITCHEN USE MADE OF NATURAL FIBERS; PARTICULARLY MADE OF FIBERS OF CHINESE RUSH AND STRAWSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jan 30, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 14, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Oct 19, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 5, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 5, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 25, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 6, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 21, 2005CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Dec 7, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Dec 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 11, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 27, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 21, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 6, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 7, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 2, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance