Drawing for BACKALARM

USPTO serial 79006447

BACKALARM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SISUN, SCOTT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BACKALARM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Reversing alarm for motor vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 15, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 7, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 7, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 4, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 28, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 12, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 12, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Sep 26, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Sep 26, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Aug 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 31, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 9, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 9, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
May 18, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 4, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 4, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 9, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 8, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 1, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 24, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 2, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance