USPTO serial 79006478
TITANIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3117307Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 18, 2006
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with TITANIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,700
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason D. Voight
5100A MacArthur Boulevard, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric food processors; electrical kitchen machines for making, cutting and shaping food pastes | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Hand-operated food processors | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | [ Non-electric coffee-pots not of precious metal; hand-operated apparatus for household use for making, cutting and shaping food pastes ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IMPERIA TRADING SRL
- Other trademarks owned by Imperia & Monferrina s.p.a.
- Other trademarks owned by IMPERIA S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by IMPERIA S.p.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named TITANIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 18, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 25, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 11, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |