Drawing for KERASEP DIAMOND

USPTO serial 79006506

KERASEP DIAMOND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3093364Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 16, 2006
Examiner
OLANDRIA, WARREN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KERASEP DIAMOND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David M. Perry, Timothy D. Pecsenye, Emily J. Barnhart, Lisa Casey Spaniel, Jennifer L. Miller, and Megan E. Spitz

DAVID M PERRY BLANK ROME LLP9TH FLONE LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Inorganic chemicals and minerals substances in the nature of filtering materials for use in manufacturing filtering parts, filters and faltering membranesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
007Filtering equipment for machines, namely, oil filters; parts for oil filtering units, namely, ceramic membranes for use in the separation processes used in factories and manufacturing plantsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
011Filtering equipment for use in industrial applications, namely, industrial membrane filters for use in the food, dairy, and biochemical industriesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 11, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 5, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Aug 14, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Nov 30, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 3, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 10, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 20, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 25, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 16, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 11, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 11, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 16, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 10, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 19, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 18, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Nov 18, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 26, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 23, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Aug 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 10, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 9, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance