Drawing for ENERGY BITES

USPTO serial 79006742

ENERGY BITES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENERGY BITES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Chocolate, bars of chocolate, sweets, waffles, confectionery, bakers' goods namely, pastries, biscuits, fancy biscuits and cakesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 14, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 17, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 28, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 28, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 20, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 20, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 1, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Jul 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 28, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 14, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 16, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance