Drawing for DUC D'O

USPTO serial 79006743

DUC D'O

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3223172Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 27, 2007
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUC D'O?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David B. Kirschstein

DAVID B KIRSCHSTEIN KIRSCHSTEIN, OTTINGER, ISRAEL, ET AL489 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-6105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030CONFECTIONERY, NAMELY, CHOCOLATE, PRALINES, CHOCOLATE TRUFFLES, CANDY, FRUIT JELLIES AND BONBONSSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 17, 2015UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Mar 27, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 27, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 2, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jul 1, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 1, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 26, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 19, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 5, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 21, 2005CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance