USPTO serial 79006866
GEONEXT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3063886Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 28, 2006
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GEONEXT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay Begler
Jay Begler Nixon Peabody LLP401 Ninth Street N.W.Suite 900Washington, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic systems for acquiring, receiving, processing and transmitting information from sensors, composed of data acquisition interface units, digital signal converters, pulse counters and tachymeters, digital, ultrasonic, electronic, electromagnetic and electric signal processors, numerical protocol and communication interface units, adapted for potentially explosive environments | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | updating of electronic systems for acquiring, receiving, processing and transmitting information from sensors, composed of data acquisition interface units, digital signal converters, pulse counters and tachymeters, digital, ultrasonic, electronic, electromagnetic and electric signal processors, numerical protocol and communication interface units, for potentially explosive environments | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GEOSERVICES EQUIPEMENTS
- Other trademarks owned by GEOSERVICES
- Other trademarks owned by GEOSERVICES
- Other trademarks owned by GEOSERVICES
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GEONEXT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 13, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |