USPTO serial 79006981
ICONO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ICONO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines and spirits | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIEDAD COOPERATIVA DE EXPORTACIÓN DE FRUTOS CÍTRICOS ANECOOP
- Other trademarks owned by ANECOOP S. COOP.
- Other trademarks owned by ANECOOP S. COOP.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named ICONO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |