USPTO serial 79007066
ELUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3275298Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 7, 2007
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Agricultural-products cultivation apparatus provided with a controllable Light Emitting Diode light source, incubators for eggs, chick brooders, chemical machines and apparatus, namely, presses, agitating machines, absorbing machines, adsorbing machines, sintering machines, calcining machines, sorting machines, granulating machines, extracting machines, emulsifying machines, kneading machines, roasting machines, disintegrators, partial condensers, separating machines, grinding mills, dissolving machines, filtering machines; fishing machines and implements, cultivating machines and implements, namely, transplanting machines and implements, weeding machines and implements, fertilizer distributing machines and implements, seeding machines and implements, intertillage machines and implements, blight prevention machines and implements, semiconductor manufacturing machines, all the above mentioned goods excluding electric pumps for barrels | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | laboratory equipment in the nature of incubators for plants; light emitting diode light source apparatus for use in laboratory or research, light emitting diode; egg-candlers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | shadowless lights for surgical operation; medical apparatus and instruments, namely, apparatus for clinical diagnosis using shadowless light, surgical apparatus and instruments for use on illuminated areas, namely, electric scalpels incorporating lighting devices, sensory light therapy unit, fluctuation lights for therapy, dental machines and apparatus for polymerization, veterinary apparatus and instruments for use on illuminated areas, namely, electric scalpels incorporating lighting devices, orthodontic appliances, medical X-ray apparatus | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | lamps incorporating light emitting diodes, electric lamps and other lighting apparatus, namely, interior lighting fixtures incorporating light emitting diodes or fluctuation lighting, namely, flashing strobe light apparatus incorporating light emitting diodes; electric lanterns, standing paper lanterns, portable paper lanterns; electric lamps incorporating light emitting diodes for use in attracting fish for use in the fishing industry and in fish preserves | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CCS Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CCS Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CCS Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named ELUX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2014 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 22, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |