Drawing for PYCNOSOME

USPTO serial 79007447

PYCNOSOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3082989Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 18, 2006
Examiner
CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PYCNOSOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marvin S. Gittes, Esq.

Marvin S. Gittes, Esq. Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.666 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics, soaps, perfumes, essential oils for use in the manufacture of scented products and essential oils for personal use, hair lotions, dentifrices, cosmetics made from plant extracts containing proanthocyanidinsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
005Pharmaceutical products, namely, anti-oxidants for medical use, dietetic products, namely, dietetic foods adapted for medical use, food supplements for medical use, pine bark extracts containing proanthocyanidins for medical useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
030pine bark extracts containing proanthocyanidins for food purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 15, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 14, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Aug 23, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Aug 23, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Nov 16, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 1, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 25, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 17, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 17, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 3, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 18, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 9, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 8, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 8, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 7, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 27, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance