Drawing for MENEGHETTI

USPTO serial 79007585

MENEGHETTI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WILKE, JOHN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MENEGHETTI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Herbert Dubno

LARA S ALAGEM MODIANO GABRIELLA D MODIANO, B AMICAELA N MODIANO, M SCVIA MERAVIGLI, 16, I-20123 MILANO

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Apparatus for cooking, namely, electric cookers, gas cooking hobs, electric cooking hobs, vitroceramic cooking hobs, induction cooking hobs, touch control vitroceramic cooking hobs, gas and electric cooking hobs, electric cooking ovens, convection ovens, domestic and commercial cooking ovens, induction ovens, microwave ovens for cooking, electric stoves, gas stoves, ventilation hoods for stoves, grills for gas and electric stoves, for electric barbecues and for electric fryers; electric fryers, electric barbecuesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Feb 9, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 25, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 1, 2008DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 10, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 23, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 21, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 13, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 29, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 29, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 20, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 20, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 27, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance