Drawing for EYE D

USPTO serial 79007708

EYE D

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3046457Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 17, 2006
Examiner
VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EYE D?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott S. Havlick

SCOTT S HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749555 17TH ST STE 3200DENVER, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in the acquisition, processing, and interpreting of seismic geophysical data for underground exploration and exploitation; scientific apparatus and instruments, namely measuring, signaling, and surveillance units for the acquisition, processing, and interpreting of seismic geophysical data for underground exploration and exploitationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Scientific research services, namely services for the acquisition, processing, and interpreting of seismic geophysical data for underground exploration and exploitation, services for the acquisition, processing, and interpreting of seismic data for hydrocarbon pool research and exploitationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Feb 13, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 26, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Aug 26, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
May 21, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
May 14, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
May 14, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 28, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 23, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Nov 23, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 8, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 8, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 5, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 20, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 8, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 7, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 4, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 3, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance