USPTO serial 79008205
URSUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3135973Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 29, 2006
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with URSUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AMSTERDAM, NL
NL-1014 BG AMSTERDAM, NL
NL-1014 BG AMSTERDAM, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer J. Millones
Jennifer J. Millones DIAGEO NORTH AMERICA, INC.801 MAIN AVENUENORWALK, CT 06851-1127UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by URSUS VODKA HOLDING N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by URSUS VODKA HOLDING N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by URSUS VODKA HOLDING N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named URSUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 29, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2013 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 8, 2013 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2011 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | C7P. | CANCELLED SEC. 7 - PARTIAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2011 | C7PF | RQST FOR SECT 7 PARTIAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2011 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 26, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 3, 2007 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |