USPTO serial 79008333
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $850
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEWART J. BELLUS
STEWART J. BELLUS COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576-1614UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINE TOOLS, NAMELY, METALWORKING MACHINE TOOLS, MILLING CUTTERS AND THREAD MILLING CUTTERS; METALWORKING MACHINES, NAMELY, MACHINING CENTERS; MACHINE TOOLS, NAMELY, LATHES AND PARTS AND LATHE PARTS, NAMELY, LATHE CHUCKS; POWER TOOL PARTS, NAMELY, COLLETS; DRILL CHUCKS FOR POWER DRILLS; METAL CLAMPS USED FOR HOLDING PIECE PARTS ON MACHINE TOOL TABLES; HIGH FREQUENCY MOTOR SPINDLES WITH HIGH FREQUENCY ELECTRIC CONVERTERS AND POWER SUPPLY UNITS; ELECTRIC MOTORS FOR MACHINES, OTHER THAN FOR LAND VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 8, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |