Drawing for MONTRESOR LUCIDACOSTE - EDGE POLISHERS

USPTO serial 79008398

MONTRESOR LUCIDACOSTE - EDGE POLISHERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3133227Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 22, 2006
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONTRESOR LUCIDACOSTE - EDGE POLISHERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines and integral parts thereof to use in polishing marble, granites, stones and porcelain materialsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 21, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 7, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Aug 30, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Aug 30, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 13, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 13, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 16, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 16, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 24, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 22, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 10, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 10, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 30, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 24, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 24, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2005ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 18, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 5, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 9, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 26, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 10, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance