Drawing for PARALOC

USPTO serial 79008755

PARALOC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3073793Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 28, 2006
Examiner
LAVACHE, ROBERT JAMES
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARALOC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stewart J. Bellus

Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
022ROPES AND STRINGS; TWISTED AND BRAIDED CORDS AND STRINGS MADE OF NATURAL, ARTIFICIAL AND SYNTHETIC FIBERSSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2025Further Decision Processed by IB—
Feb 19, 2025XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2025INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2025XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jan 30, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 1, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 4, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 25, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
May 25, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 25, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
May 25, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 30, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 7, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 2, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 27, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 19, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 9, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 1, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 18, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance