USPTO serial 79009136
SAFE GUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAFE GUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE AND PERIPHERALS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR PROTECTING ACCESS AND ENCRYPTING DATA ON PC s AND CLIENT-SERVICE SYSTEMS | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 31, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |