Drawing for METAL GURU

USPTO serial 79010015

METAL GURU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3229993Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 17, 2007
Examiner
HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with METAL GURU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

D Bruce Prout

D BRUCE PROUT CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009OPTICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, SUNGLASSES, SUNGLASS LENSES, FRAMES FOR SUNGLASSES, CASES FOR SUNGLASSES, CHAINS FOR SUNGLASSES, SPECTACLE GLASSES, SPECTACLE FRAMES, CASES FOR SPECTACLES, CHAINS FOR SPECTACLES, BINOCULARSSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
014JEWELRY, PRECIOUS STONES; HOROLOGICAL AND CHRONOMETRIC INSTRUMENTSSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 8, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 26, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 4, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 31, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 22, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 22, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 15, 2011LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Feb 11, 2011LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 17, 2010RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 10, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 25, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 30, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 10, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 5, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 16, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 20, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 5, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 5, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 12, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 11, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 21, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2005RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 13, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 10, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 5, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance