Drawing for DIGITIME

USPTO serial 79010512

DIGITIME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3233525Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 24, 2007
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITIME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil F. Greenblum/Charles S. Murray, Jr.

VANDER-HEYM SERGE172, BD VOLTAIRE, F-75011 PARISFRANCE

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Time management devices, namely, time clocksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 14, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 19, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 3, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 3, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jul 29, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 29, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jun 25, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 26, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 4, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 4, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 25, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 24, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 7, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 17, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 14, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Nov 2, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 2, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Nov 1, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Nov 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 12, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 29, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 29, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Apr 3, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Mar 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 23, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 16, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 31, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB
Aug 25, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 24, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jun 2, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance