Drawing for M SOUP CONDITIONER

USPTO serial 79011457

M SOUP CONDITIONER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3258823Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 3, 2007
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M SOUP CONDITIONER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John E. McKie

CABINET LAVOIX F-75009 PARIS2, PL D'ESTIENNE D'ORVES,FRANCE

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Disinfectants for hygiene purposes, veterinary preparations for protection against fleas, ticks and liceSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
031Animal foodstuffsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 18, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 5, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 9, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Apr 9, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Oct 7, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 7, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 22, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 10, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 3, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 27, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 22, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 29, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 21, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 7, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Dec 7, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 20, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 20, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 16, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jan 12, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 21, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 14, 2005CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Jul 8, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jul 7, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance