Drawing for TEXTMAKER

USPTO serial 79011674

TEXTMAKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3104183Status 707Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 13, 2006
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with TEXTMAKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*

Plus Government fees of $1,700

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil A. Salyards

Neil A. Salyards Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Computer hardware; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; ] Pre-recorded data carriers featuring computer programs; data processors, computer softwareACTIVE
016[ Typewriters; office requisites, namely, office machines for labeling, lettering and binding; ] [ Printed and electronic instructional and teaching materials in the fields of computer programs, computer hardware, and telecommunications ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
038[ Transmission of information and data of any type including computer programs, messages, voice, sound, video, images and documents on electronic, optical and wireless computer and communication networks; Electronic data interchange; Electronic mail services; Internet telephony services; Providing voice communication services via the Internet; Network conferencing services; Audio and video teleconferencing; Web conferencing services ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Computer software developmentACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Sep 15, 202671.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED
Sep 7, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 10, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jun 13, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 6, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Apr 18, 2017INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Feb 11, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 12, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 11, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 9, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jun 9, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 13, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 5, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 28, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 31, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 27, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 27, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jun 27, 2012C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 27, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 2, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
May 2, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
May 2, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 24, 2012NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT
Aug 16, 2011NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT
May 24, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 7, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 20, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 20, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 13, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 13, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 23, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 20, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2005CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED
Nov 17, 2005CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 26, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB
Aug 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 18, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jul 14, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance