Drawing for DUFRE

USPTO serial 79011717

DUFRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAPTER, ALAIN J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUFRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Tea, coffee, artificial coffee, iced tea, tea-based beverages, coffee-based beverages, coffee beverages with milkSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 24, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 20, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 7, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 31, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 6, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 12, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 25, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 20, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2005RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Aug 13, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance