USPTO serial 79012144
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
PASS Process Automation Software Systems Engineering GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by PASS Process Automation Software Systems Engineering GmbH
PASS Process Automation Software Systems Engineering GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by PASS Process Automation Software Systems Engineering GmbH
DE
PASS Process Automation Software Systems Engineering GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by PASS Process Automation Software Systems Engineering GmbH
GB
DD
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aylin Demirci
Aylin Demirci Carr & Ferrell LLP120 Constitution DriveMENLO PARK, CA 94025UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely computer aided translation tool for translating software written in one language into another language | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | [ Computer program manuals and operating and user instruction sheets for data processing device and computer and data processing programs ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Development and creation of technical and scientific data processing programs ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 14, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 23, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |