USPTO serial 79012492
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ THERMOSTATS; TEMPERATURE CONTROLLERS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN THE CONTROL OF THERMOSTATS ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Apparatus for lighting, water supply and sanitary purposes, namely, electric lighting fixtures, [ steam generators, towel dryers, water purifiers and filters; ] plumbing fittings, namely, valves, shower sprayers, [ toilets, bidets; water storage units and water treatment installations, namely, strainers for water lines, waste water purification units, water conditioning units, water purification tanks, water softening units; water refinement installations, namely, filtering units for producing potable water for domestic use, water purifiers; filtering installations, namely, water filtering units for domestic and commercial use; filters, namely, water filters; apparatus for ultraviolet ray treatment, not for medical purposes, namely, ultraviolet sterilization units for water treatment; ] plumbing fittings, namely, mixing valves, manually and automatically operated mixing valves, mixer taps for wash stands, bidets, sinks, bath tubs and shower tubs; hydro massage apparatus, namely, [ bath tubs; sanitary tubs, bath tubs, shower tubs, ] whirlpool tubs, [ bidets, showers and shower cabins being shower enclosures; ] shower and shower combinations, namely, overhead showers, lateral showers and hand showers; shower nozzles, namely, shower heads; pre-assembled multifunctional showers; supply and discharge fittings for sanitary basins, wash stands, sinks, bidets, bath tubs and shower tubs, namely, traps, valves, tub and shower control valves, spouts, aerators for faucets; water jet aerators for faucets; [ supply and discharge pipes being parts of sanitary facilities; casings and revetments generally made of non metallic materials as parts of sanitary installations, namely, shower doors and shower enclosures; siphons, namely, plumbing traps ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | [ Non-metal wall-mounted shaving mirrors, wall mirrors, [ wardrobes with mirrors for the bathroom, cupboards with mirrors, valves for water conduits of plastic being other than machine parts; ] replacement parts of the aforesaid goods ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 13, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 22, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |