USPTO serial 79012976
LANDGUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3159006Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LANDGUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald E. Shapiro
Ronald E. Shapiro Shapiro and Silverstein PLLC11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 740FAIRFAX, VA 22030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical products to degrade, neutralize or break down waste products; chemical products to degrade, neutralize or break down all pesticides; chemical products to destroy, consume, remove or extract waste products; chemical products to destroy, consume, remove or extract all pesticides; enzyme preparations used in agriculture, horticulture and forestry; enzyme preparations to degrade, neutralize or break down waste products and waste substances, enzyme preparations to degrade, neutralize or break down all pesticides; enzyme preparations to consume, remove, extract or destroy waste products, enzyme preparations to consume, remove, extract or destroy all pesticides; enzyme substrates | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
- Other trademarks owned by Orica Australia Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Orica Australia Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Orica Australia Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named LANDGUARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |