Drawing for MEPHISTO

USPTO serial 79012982

MEPHISTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3329600Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 6, 2007
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEPHISTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Whitney E Peterson

Whitney E Peterson Mad Catz Inc7480 Mission Valley Road Suite 1017724 Roan RoadSAN DIEGO, CA 92108-4433

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Accessories for chess computers and bridge computers, namely, electronic CPU clocks for chess and bridge playing computers; battery chargers; electronic equipment, namely, video game machines adapted for use with television receivers sold as a unit for playing, training and/or teaching chess; electronic equipment adapted for use with television receivers for playing, teaching and/or training for chess; chess computers, travel chess computers, computer chess trainers, computer chess challengers; electronic equipment adapted for use with television receivers for playing, teaching and/or training for bridge games, namely, bridge computersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
028Games, namely, electronic games sold as a unit, not adapted for use with television receivers, being electronic table top and floor units, for playing, training and/or teaching chess.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Education in the field of chess and bridge rendered through correspondence courses and/or interactive courses via a global computer network; entertainment in the nature of chess tournaments; conducting and providing facilities for special events featuring chess tournaments; providing a website through which chess players can locate information about chess and chess tournamentsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 15, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 12, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 8, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 8, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 6, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 3, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 24, 201471AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Apr 24, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 20, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 27, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 22, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 22, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 6, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 6, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 21, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 15, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 9, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 8, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance