Drawing for SHENGQIBAO

USPTO serial 79013025

SHENGQIBAO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3177236Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 28, 2006
Examiner
FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHENGQIBAO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN AHMIT

Zhejiang Shengqi Motion Apparatus Co., Ltd.Duancun, Southeast Industrial ZoneWuyi, Zhejiang,CHINA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Electric vehicles, namely electric cars, electric railway cars, electric locomotives, electric and motorized and non-motorized scooters; electric motors for land vehicles, namely, for railway rolling stock, for electric locomotives, for motor cars for transport on land, and for electric motorcycles; cycle cars, namely motorcycle sidecars to carry the weight of no more than 2 tons; railway passenger cars to take no more than 20 passengers, minicars, namely, small automobiles; pocket bikes, namely, miniature motorcyclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Sep 18, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Sep 18, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 5, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Oct 5, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Oct 4, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 26, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Sep 26, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 9, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 6, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 6, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jun 28, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 17, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 10, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 30, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 26, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 26, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 14, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Apr 25, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 25, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 20, 2006NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED
Jan 19, 2006NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED
Jan 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 14, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 23, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 23, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance