Drawing for HYDRO SAFE

USPTO serial 79013042

HYDRO SAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3162850Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 24, 2006
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYDRO SAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leon Medzhibovsky

LEON MEDZHIBOVSKY FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP666 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10103-3198UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical preparations used in industry for the production of cosmetic preparations, hair dye, permanent wave preparations, and cleaning preparations for the body, namely, skin cleansers, shower gel and skin soapsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
003Soaps, perfumery, essential oils for personal use; cosmetics, namely, eye makeup and facial makeup; shampoos and hair conditioners; hair color and dyes; color removal and lightening preparations and hair bleaches; hair styling and finishing products, namely, hair sprays, spray gels, gels, mousses, creams, lotions, pomades and hair waxes; permanent wave preparations; hair and scalp treatments, namely, restructurizers, scalp conditioners and hair lotions; and dentifricesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jul 17, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jul 17, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 28, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Sep 30, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Sep 30, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 20, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 20, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jul 3, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 20, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 31, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 30, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 21, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 24, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 8, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 19, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 18, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 18, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jun 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 13, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 13, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 13, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 9, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 6, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jun 6, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 21, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Apr 6, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 6, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 7, 2005IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU
Sep 30, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 14, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB
Sep 8, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 8, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance