Drawing for SALTY DOG

USPTO serial 79013202

SALTY DOG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SALTY DOG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Milena S. Mishev

H JOHN CAMPAIGN, JOHN M KEENE, MILENA GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN PC36 W 44TH ST STE 1201NEW YORK, NY 10036-8178UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps, namely, hand soap and skin soap, perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotionsACTIVE—
009Spectacles and sunglasses; spectacle frames; pouches and cases for spectaclesACTIVE—
014Precious metals and their alloys, namely, silver and gold; jewelry; precious stones; horological and chronometric instruments and watchesACTIVE—
018Leather semi-worked and imitation leather; and leather and imitation leather goods, namely, cases; umbrellas and parasols; luggage, namely, trunks and traveling bags; athletic bags, carry-all bagsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, trousers, shorts, Bermuda shorts, skirts, dresses, sweaters, pullovers and vests, jackets, overcoats, jackets and waist coats, blouses and shirt, undershirt, t-shirt, shawls, hand shoes, namely, gloves, mittens, socks, stocking, pantyhose and maillots; footwear;headgear, namely, bonnets, hats and capsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2008DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 24, 2008LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Jul 9, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 29, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 4, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 11, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2006ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 10, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 2, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 20, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance