USPTO serial 79013222
FINN BABY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3174300Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 21, 2006
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FINN BABY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Simonelli
David J. Simonelli Reising Ethington Barnes Kisselle, P.C.P.O. Box 4390Troy, MI 48099-4390UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and cosmetic preparations for skin and body care; skin care products, namely lotions, oils for hair and skin conditioning; shampoos; non-medicated toiletries; soaps; cosmetic pencils; sun-tanning and sunscreen preparations; bath oils; bath salts not for medical purposes; massage oils; skin moisturizers; hair lotions; hair care preparations; teeth cleaning preparations; bleaching preparations for laundry use | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of pain, fever, cuts, wounds and abrasions; dietetic substances adapted for medical use, namely food for babies; medical plasters; materials for dressings, namely wound dressings and bandages; all purpose disinfectants; medicated lip balms; creams for disinfecting wounds, cuts and abrasions, creams for soothing skin irritation and other medical conditions of skin; lotions for disinfecting wounds, cuts and abrasions, gels for disinfecting wounds, cuts and abrasions and powders for disinfecting wounds, cuts and abrasions for babies, infants and children; medicated nappy/diaper balms for nappy diaper rashes; vitamins and vitamin complexes; medicated bath preparations; bath salts for medical purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cosmetic Developments Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Cosmetic Developments Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Cosmetic Developments Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named FINN BABY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 2, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |