USPTO serial 79013227
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,300
#13-309, Singapore, SG
Singapore, SG
Singapore, SG
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEIGH ANN LINDQUIST
LEIGH ANN LINDQUIST SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Preparations made wholly or principally of bean curd, namely, dried bean curd sticks and dried bean curd sheets; dried beans; processed soy beans; processed vegetables; dried vegetables; preserved vegetables; canned vegetables; processed nuts, including peanuts chestnuts and edible nuts; processed chick peas; processed peas; sausages; preserved fruits; canned fruits; dried fruits, processed anchovies; oysters, prawns, shellfish and shrimp, all not live; preserved fish; salted fish; dried fish; canned fish; dried potatoes; dried tangerines; processed edible seeds; dried mushrooms; prepared mushrooms; mollusca; pork; processed dates and prunes; dried preparations for making soup; canned soups; processed almonds; dried apricots; processed figs; jellies for food; sliced cuttlefish and dried cuttlefish for human consumption; processed edible sesame seeds | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Spices; cinnamon; spices in the form of powders, including tumeric powders for use as a condiment, saffron for use as a seasoning and curry powders; sauce powders; cloves; vermicelli noodles; noodles; rice; rice cakes; ground pepper; sugar; husked barley prepared for human consumption; prepared pearl barley; sago; star aniseed; prawn crackers; crackers; dried whole-wheat grains; honey; processed corn; candy for food; soy sauce; dried chili peppers for use as seasoning; processed garlic toppings for cooking; preserved garlic for use as seasoning; desserts of nut, fruit and/or jelly origin | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2011 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |